Julia Middendorf vs Sofia Nami Samavati Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Middendorf vs S. Nami Samavati

Julia Middendorf
GER
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
25
-
Height
-
771
C. Rank
831
347
Best Rank
272
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$5.4K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Sofia Nami Samavati
DEN
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
25
-
Height
-
771
C. Rank
831
347
Best Rank
272
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$5.4K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Middendorf 1 - 0 Samavati
They have played 3 sets in total, with Julia Middendorf winning 2 and Sofia Nami Samavati winning 1. The last match between Julia Middendorf and Sofia Nami Samavati was at the W15 Erwitte, 22-08-2021, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Julia Middendorf getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Middendorf | 1 |
| Samavati | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) W15 Erwitte(08-22-21)
Julia Middendorf
3
7
6
Sofia Nami Samavati
6
5
2
J. Middendorf vs S. N. Samavati H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,362 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.34% (120-93) | Career Total W/L | 61.80% (110-68) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Middendorf vs S. N. Samavati Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Julia Middendorf has won 36.36% of points on their second serve, while Sofia Nami Samavati has won 35.00%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Julia Middendorf, in recent form, has won 53.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sofia Nami Samavati has won 50.00%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.60% and 14.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Julia Middendorf has saved 47.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sofia Nami Samavati has saved 28.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Julia Middendorf has won 37.50% of matches played (W/L 3/5), with Sofia Nami Samavati winning 0% (W/L 0/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Julia Middendorf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Sofia Nami Samavati has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 86/44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 16/16).
- Player level: In the last year, Julia Middendorf has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 2/3), where as Sofia Nami Samavati has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Julia Middendorf winning 1 times and Sofia Nami Samavati being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Julia Middendorf winning 2 and Sofia Nami Samavati winning 1.
- The last match between Julia Middendorf and Sofia Nami Samavati was at the W15 Erwitte, 22-08-2021, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Julia Middendorf getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Julia Middendorf has played against opponents with an average rank of 683.5 while Sofia Nami Samavati has played against players with an average rank of 705.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Julia Middendorf has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sofia Nami Samavati has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Julia Middendorf has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sofia Nami Samavati has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Julia Middendorf vs Sofia Nami Samavati Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Middendorf vs S. N. Samavati H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Middendorf 38%, Samavati 35%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Middendorf 52%, Samavati 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Middendorf 49%, Samavati 29%.
J. Middendorf Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 1-6 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 7-6(1) | ||
S. N. Samavati Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 4-5 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 4-6 6-1 | ||

J. Middendorf vs S. N. Samavati Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.34% (120/93) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.80% (110/68) |
| 52.85% (260/232) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.15% (240/159) |
| 51.07% (2324/2227) | Games Win/Loss | 54.30% (1944/1636) |
| 68.75% (11/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 59.09% (91/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.15% (86/44) |
| 43.90% (18/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.57% (17/18) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 321 | Aces Total | 138 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 729 | Total Double Faults | 638 |
| 1:31:16 | Average Match Time | 1:18:19 |
| 468.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.17 |
| 60% (8145/13605) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5672/8709) |
| 61% (4993/8145) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3331/5672) |
| 43% (2328/5460) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1338/3037) |
| 48% (846/1750) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (609/1182) |
| 46% (6345/13688) | Return Points Win % | 48% (4203/8720) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.94% (81/78) | Challenger W/L | 58.73% (37/26) |
| 78.72% (37/10) | Futures W/L | 64.55% (71/39) |
| 56% (117/208) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (106/173) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (23/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (16/26) |
| 67% (47/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (24/48) |
| 91% (96/87) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (104/95) |
| 9% (96/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (104/9) |
| 28% (116/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (74/15) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction11:05 PM 14/11/25
Prediction05:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction08:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction10:30 AM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 6-3
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico